Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Anand Patwardhan Writes of Justice Following the Mumbai Massacre

It's only been two weeks. Two weeks.

Thanksgiving in America was intruded upon by events half way around the world. We were told early on that the terrorists on the rampage in Mumbai were targeting British and American citizens. Then, it became clear, they were targeting the Chabad House also.

How many of us took time away from our feast to watch? The answer is many, because after all, somehow again "we" were targeted, our citizens were in peril at luxurious hotels, a Jewish institution was also targeted. The "usual targets". As we were celebrating with family, an uneasy eye was at the same time watching the news, that is those who watch the news were watching the news. I am quite certain many people wouldn't have taken any time away from their feast at all if it were not for the fact that we were being told AMERICANS had been targeted.

How many people actually realized that this was happening in INDIA and that it would be INDIA which would bear the the repercussions? That more INDIANS were massacred in this attack than ANYONE else? Do we care? Has our media followed their stories? Have we seen THEIR sorrow?

The answer to that is quite simply, no. We instead have been fed a steady diet of the handful of Americans who died, may they forever rest in peace, and the story of the Chabad house. Little Moishe who lost his parents has had enough attention paid to him to last a lifetime. Memorial after memorial. It is SAD, it is beyond imagination SAD and tragic that he lost his parents. But many INDIAN children also have been orphaned.

Am I trying to suggest that these non-Indians are not worthy of our complete and utter pouring out of sympathy?

Absolutely not. However, if we here in America and those in Israel cannot see that every single life lost in this tragedy is not FULLY equal to the other, then there is something deeply wrong with our own moral psyche. Why is such utter self-interest on such ghoulish display in this tragedy when the victims were of MANY different nationalities as well as religion? Why is the nanny to little Moishe who risked her own life to save him ANY more worthy of media attention than all the other Indians who certainly DIED attempting to help?

Somehow this really bothers me.

Then there is the "hunt" for the perpetrators. Muslims again. They have been identified as Pakistanis. Yet at the same time the Muslim cemetery officials in Mumbai have refused to allow their burial because they do not want these monsters buried in their cemetery. Yes monsters, lest we forget, they come in every shape form and religion and again, if you cannot mourn all the victims equally, then you are most certainly of the same mind to not recognize the fact that monsters exist who CLAIM adherence to other faiths as well.

Speaking of other faiths perpetrating terrorist acts in India, right after this tragedy I came across a website which is frightening beyond words. The sight has disappeared, but you can find it in cache, hinduunity. Read about their agenda HERE which includes rants against Christianity as well as Islam. Hinduunity maintains close ties to the Kahanist movement which has been declared a terrorist organization by both the US and Israeli governments. According to the following article from 2001, members of Hindu Unity marched with members of the Kahanist movement in New York.

Meanwhile, Anand Patwardhan, one of India's most well known film makers and social activists writes of justice following the horrendous terrorist attack in Mumbai in which members of many faiths and nationalities were brutally murdered. Anand's website can be linked HERE.

And please remember, that no matter who was killed in this terrorist massacre, this occurred in INDIA which is crucial to understanding.

For all the families of the victims grieving their loss, be they Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, Christian, other faiths, Indian, non-Indian, may your souls heal and may India come together without further bloodshed on their soil.


Of The 200 Killed In Mumbai, A High Number Were Muslims

ANAND PATWARDHAN argues that real security has to be accompanied by real justice

Terror: The Aftermath
In Mumbai, after the numbing sorrow came the blame game and the solutions. Loud voices amplified by saturation TV: Why don’t we amend our Constitution to create new anti-terror laws? Why don’t we arm our police with AK 47s? Why don’t we do what Israel did after Munich or the USA did after 9/11 and hot pursue the enemy? Solutions that would lead us further into the abyss. For terror is a self-fulfilling prophecy. It thrives on reaction, polarisation, militarisation and the thirst for revenge.

The External Terror
Those who invoke America need only to analyse if its actions after 9/11 increased or decreased global terror. It invaded oil-rich Iraq fully knowing that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, killing over 200,000 Iraqis citizens but allowing a cornered Bin Laden to escape from Afghanistan. It recruited global support for Islamic militancy, which began to be seen as a just resistance against American mass murder. Which begs the question of who created Bin Laden in the first place, armed the madarsas of Pakistan and rejuvenated the concept of Islamic jehad? Israel played its own role in stoking the fires of jehad. The very creation of Israel in 1948 robbed Palestinians of their land, an act that Mahatma Gandhi to his credit deplored at the time as an unjust way to redress the wrongs done to Jews during the Holocaust. What followed has been a slow and continuing attack on the Palestinian nation. At first Palestinian resistance was led by secular forces represented by Yasser Arafat but as these were successfully undermined, Islamic forces took over the mantle. The first, largely non-violent Intifada was crushed, a second more violent one replaced it and when all else failed, human bombs appeared.

Thirty years ago when I first went abroad there were two countries my Indian passport forbade me to visit. One was racist South Africa. The other was Israel. We were non-aligned and stood for disarmament and world peace. Today Israel and America are our biggest military allies. Is it surprising that we are on the jehadi hit list? Israel, America and other prosperous countries can to an extent protect themselves against the determined jehadi, but can India put an impenetrable shield over itself? Remember that when attackers are on a suicide mission, the strongest shields have crumbled. New York was laid low not with nuclear weapons but with a pair of box cutters. India is for many reasons a quintessentially soft target. Our huge population, vast landmass and coastline are impossible to protect. The rich may build new barricades. The Taj and the Oberoi can be made safer. So can our airports and planes. Can our railway stations and trains, bus stops, busses, markets and lanes do the same?

The Terror Within
The threat of terror in India does not come exclusively from the outside. Apart from being hugely populated by the poor India is also a country divided, not just between rich and poor, but by religion, caste and language. This internal divide is as potent a breeding ground for terror as jehadi camps abroad. Nor is jehad the copyright of one religion alone. It can be argued that international causes apart, India has jehadis that are fully home grown. Perhaps the earliest famous one was Nathuram Godse who acting at the behest of his mentor Vinayak Savarkar (still referred to as “Veer” or “brave” although he refused to own up to his role in the conspiracy), murdered Mahatma Gandhi for the crime of championing Muslims.

Jump forward to 6th December, 1992, the day Hindu fanatics demolished the Babri Mosque setting into motion a chain of events that still wreaks havoc today. From the Bombay riots of 1992 to the bomb blasts of 1993, the Gujarat pogroms of 2002 and hundreds of smaller deadly events, the last 16 years have been the bloodiest since Partition. Action has been followed by reaction in an endless cycle of escalating retribution. At the core on the Hindu side of terror are organizations that openly admire Adolph Hitler, nursing the hate of historic wrongs inflicted by Muslims. Ironically these votaries of Hitler remain friends and admirers of Israel.

On the Muslim side of terror are scores of disaffected youth, many of whom have seen their families tortured and killed in more recent pogroms. Christians too have fallen victim to recent Hindutva terror but as yet not formed the mechanisms for revenge. Dalits despite centuries of caste oppression, have not yet retaliated in violence although a small fraction is being drawn into an armed struggle waged by Naxalites.

It is clear that no amount of spending on defense, no amount of patrolling the high seas, no amount of increasing the military and police and equipping them with the latest weaponry can end the cycle of violence or place India under a bubble of safety. Just as nuclear India did not lead to more safety, but only to a nuclear Pakistan, no amount of homeland security can save us. And inviting Israel’s Mossad and America’s CIA/FBI to the security table is like giving the anti-virus contract to those who spread the virus in the first place. It can only make us more of a target for the next determined jehadi attack.

Policing, Justice and the Media
As for draconian anti-terror laws, they too only breed terror as for the most part they are implemented by a state machinery that has imbibed majoritarian values. So in Modi’s Gujarat after the ethnic cleansing of Muslims in 2002, despite scores of confessions to rape and murder captured on hidden camera, virtually no Hindu extremists were punished while thousands of Muslims rotted in jail under draconian laws. The same happened in Bombay despite the Shiv Sena being found guilty by the Justice Shrikrishna Commission. Under pressure a few cases were finally brought to trial but all escaped with the lightest of knuckle raps. In stark contrast many Muslims accused in the 1993 bomb blasts were given death sentences.

The bulk of our media, policing and judicial systems swallows the canard that Muslims are by nature violent. Removing democratic safeguards guaranteed by the Constitution can only make this worse. Every act of wrongful imprisonment and torture that then follows is likely to turn innocents into material for future terrorists to draw upon. Already the double standards are visible. While the Students Islamic Movement of India is banned, Hindutva outfits like the RSS, the VHP, the Bajrang Dal, and the Shiv Sena remain legal entities. The leader of the MNS, Raj Thackeray recently openly spread such hatred that several north Indians were killed by lynch mobs. Amongst these were the Dube brothers, doctors from Kalyan who treated the poor for a grand fee of Rs.10 per patient. Raj Thackeray like his uncle Bal before him, remains free after issuing public threats that Bombay would burn if anyone had the guts to arrest him. Modi remains free despite the pogroms of Gujarat. Congress party murderers of Sikhs in 1984 remain free. Justice in India is clearly not there for all. Increasing the powers of the police cannot solve this problem. Only honest and unbiased implementation of laws that exist, can.

It is a tragedy of the highest proportions that one such honest policeman, Anti-Terrorist Squad chief Hemant Karkare, who had begun to unravel the thread of Hindutva terror was himself gunned down, perhaps by Muslim terror. It is reported that Col. Purohit and fellow Hindutva conspirators now in judicial custody, celebrated the news of Karkare’s death. Until Karkare took charge, the Malegaon bomb blasts in which Muslims were killed and the Samjhauta Express blasts in which Pakistani visitors to India were killed were being blamed on Muslims. Karkare exposed a hitherto unknown Hindutva outfit as masterminding a series of killer blasts across the country. For his pains Karkare came under vicious attack not just from militant Hindutva but from the mainstream BJP. He was under tremendous pressure to prove his patriotism. Was it this that led this senior officer to don helmet and ill-fitting bullet proof vest and rush into battle with a pistol? Or was it just his natural instinct, the same courage that had led him against all odds, to expose Hindutva terror?

Whatever it was, it only underlines the fact that jehadis of all kinds are actually allies of each other. So Bin Laden served George Bush and vice-versa. So Islamic and Hindutva jehadis have served each other for years. Do they care who dies? Of the 200 people killed in the last few days by Islamic jehadis, a high number were Muslims. Many were waiting to board trains to celebrate Eid in their hometowns in UP and Bihar, when their co-religionists gunned them down. Shockingly the media has not commented on this, nor focused on the tragedy at the railway station, choosing to concentrate on tragedies that befell the well-to-do. And it is the media that is leading the charge to turn us into a war-mongering police state where we may lead lives with an illusion of safety, but with the certainty of joylessness.

I am not arguing that we do not need efficient security at public places and at vulnerable sites. But real security will only come when it is accompanied by real justice, when the principles of democracy are implemented in every part of the country, when the legitimate grievances of people are not crushed, when the arms race is replaced by a race for decency and humanity, when our children grow up in an atmosphere where religious faith is put to the test of reason. Until such time we will remain at the mercy of “patriots” and zealots.

(SOURCE)

No comments:

Post a Comment