Holly is a symbol of goodwill and joy. In the Victorian language of flowers, holly means foresight. Holly is seen as a symbol of good luck in both Christianity and Islam. But most importantly for me, it is said that disputes are often solved "under the holly tree"
Heads of Churches in Jerusalem Easter 2008 Message 2008-03-23 | "In the evening of the first day of the week, Jesus came and stood among them. He said to them, "Peace be with you" and showed them his hands and his side. The disciples were filled with joy when they saw the Lord and again he said to them "Peace be with you." St. John ch.20 vv 19-21
Dear Sisters and Brothers,
Christ is risen.
Many people limit their thoughts on Easter to the empty tomb. How important then, for us to concentrate on the first manifestation which our Lord made to his disciples. There is considerable encouragement to be gained from the fact that the living Christ is greeting his living Church. We do not under estimate the burden of so many of our faithful today from the continuing violence and acts of terrorism that surround them, and of which we all are victims, in the West Bank, in Gaza and in the Israeli society. Nevertheless, the Risen Lord reminds us and tells us that we have a role and we have to change the present situation, through the power and strength which He gives us.
On that first Easter evening it seems obvious that the disciples were full of fear mingled no doubt with doubt and perplexity So much had happened to make them uncertain of the future and consequently they were afraid. However, in their moment of greatest need Jesus came and stood amongst them. At least they believed that he suddenly appeared to them. Because, since they saw him die on the Cross, they believed that everything had ended and the Master has abandoned them. But, fear, weakness and locked doors could not keep Jesus from his disciples... then or now ! He appeared to them glorious and renewed their faith.
In giving the disciples the conventional greeting "Peace be with you" Jesus is seeking to quieten the hearts of his anxious and troubled disciples. He shows them his hands and his side to convince them of his identity as the one recently crucified. So their fear and doubt are replaced by joy. Today we too, we live in fear and perplexity. We too need to see the Risen Lord, in order to take away perplexity and fear because of all that is happening around us and in us, so to replace our fear and anxiety with peace and joy.
However the message of Easter does not end there. The new joy is a mission which the apostles have to bring to the world. Jesus sent them to the troubled world as a whole in order to bring to every one its joy and peace.
So Jesus says: "As my Father has sent me, even so send I you."
In this way Jesus reveals that his Church is to be the instrument through which his saving power is to be made known to the world as the lives of men and women are challenged to submit to the claims of his Kingdom.
More is revealed as Jesus tells the disciples of the spiritual power which will be given them to enable them to fulfil their task which he has given them
"He breathed on them and said Receive the Holy Spirit"
In that instance he is preparing them for the forthcoming Pentecost. He also shows them the intimate relationship between himself and the Holy Spirit, sometimes described in the Early Church as "the Spirit of Christ".
Having told the disciples of the spiritual power He is giving them Jesus then makes it clear that the Church has a specific function in the world to explain and convince people that men and women have a respons¬ibility to confess their sins. If they truly repent and relieve then their sins are forgiven.
It is very normal that we bring the same message to our Land. Similarly we have to take away the many burdens on people's lives caused by Occupation, bloodshed, violence and killings and mutual hatred, as well as the wrong ways followed so far to reach security. In all these situations of death we demonstrate that we are the apostles of the resurrection, with its joy and hope. We have to tell the people that the present situation in which we are living is part of the world's sin, but it must also be part of the new power given to us by the Risen Lord. Hence we invite them to make penitence, to admit their involvement in the sin of the world, to be forgiven and to become able to see the right ways that lead to security and peace. We say this to our Leaders in Palestine and Israel. The ways used until today to reach security must be changed. If not, we will remain in the same positions in a permanent cycle of violence. For you, Leaders of this Land, we ask that God give you light and strength to take away from it death and fear so as to restore in it peace with security.
So, as we greet all of you this Eastertide we urge all concerned to demonstrate their faith in more positive terms not least showing their personal belief in a Risen and Glorified Jesus. Moreover, our Jesus is no figure of history but rather the One to teach us and guide us along the path of peace and new life.
To our friends across the world we wish the peace and joy of the Risen Lord. Thank you for your prayerful support but please we would ask that you recall that your faith in Christ has its origin in this Holy Land. You have to assume your responsibilities here. You too are responsible with us for restoring in it the joy of the Resurrection so as to lift the burdens of death, hatred, Occupation, Security Walls and the fear of taking the risk of peace. Do whatever you can and please involve your Governments too to assume their responsibilities for the peace of this Land.
Pray for us as well as for a just and comprehensive peace in this Land ; pray that fear, the main obstacle for peace, will disappear. Pray that people recognize and accept each other, so that the right ways be open before the glory of the Resurrection so that this Land of the resurrection may enjoy the new life to which God has called it.
Christ is risen.
Happy and Holy Easter.
Patriarchs and Heads of the Churches in Jerusalem Patriarch Theophilos III, Greek Orthodox Patriarch Michel Sabbah, R.C. Latin Patriarch Torkom I Manoogian, Armenian Orthodox Fr Pierbattista Pizzaballa, ofm, Custos of the Holy Land Archbishop Anba Abraham, Coptic Orthodox Archbishop Swerios Malki Murad, Syrian-Orthodox Archbishop Abouna Matthias, Ethiopian Orthodox Archbishop Paul Sayyah, Maronite Bishop Suhail Dawani, Anglican Bishop Mounib Younan, Lutheran Bishop Pierre Malki, Syrian- Catholic Archimandrite Joseph Saghbini, Greek Catholic Fr. Rafael Minassian, Armenian Catholic (source)
Churches & monasteries of Jerusalem 1- The Monastery of the Cross in Jerusalem, built at the epoch of Constantine the great or at the epoch of Justinian and Theodora and was rased to the ground by Persians, it was rebuilt at the 11th century by Georgians (under the patronage of Queen Tamar of Georgia), is situated in the Valley of the Cross (Georgian: ჯვრის მონასტერი, Hebrew: עמק המצלבה Emeq HaMatzlevah) ( 31°46'20.27"N, 35°12'30.96"E, 783m) overlooked by the Israel Museum and the Knesset. 2- Gethsemane (from the Hebrew "Gat Shemanim", which means "oil press", Γεθσημανι ) was the garden where, according to the New Testament and Christian traditions, Jesus and his disciples retreated to pray after the Last Supper, the night before he was crucified (see Atonement). According to Luke 22:43--44, Jesus' anguish in Gethsemane was so deep that "his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground." Gethsemane was also where Christ was betrayed by the disciple Judas Iscariot. Furthermore Catholic and Orthodox tradition holds that Gethsemane is the place where the Apostles buried the Blessed Virgin Mary, after her dormition. 3- Mary's Tomb is a tomb located in the Kidron Valley, on the foothills of Mount of Olives, near the Church of All Nations and Gethsemane garden, originally just outside Jerusalem. It is attributed to Theotokos (Mary, the mother of Jesus) by Eastern Christians. Χριστός ἀνέστη! Ἀληθῶς ἀνέστη! Christus resurrexit! Resurrexit vere! Христос воскрес! Воистину воскрес !المسيح قام! حقا قام ハリストス復活!実に復活! Tá Críost éirithe! Go deimhin, tá sé éirithe. Cristo ha resucitado! ¡En verdad ha resucitado. Christ is Risen! Indeed He is Risen. Kristus är uppstånden! Ja, Han är verkligen uppstånden !המשיח קם! באמת קם
In today's world here in the US, pundits from all directions, politicians and entities as all powerful as Homeland Security want us to think that we are in a fight for our lives against "Islamofascism", some are more than interested in the personal faiths of the presidential candidates and how this "faith" will help them lead our country.
No politician can possibly hope to survive without a firm policy on how to protect our nation against the possibility of an "Islamic" terrorist attack. Any crack perceived in a candidate's dedication to "protect" our country is sheer political suicide.
Yet how do Muslim nations compare in the rise of militant Islam which is broadcast daily in to our homes to remind us all to be afraid, VERY afraid, to the unknown shadowy influence of so called "Christianity" in our own country? Do these Muslim nations have the militaries available to them to destroy and occupy our country like our own country has and has USED to occupy Muslim nations? Should we be listening when scare tactics are used to inflame our fears post 9/11? Is Islam the dire threat to our nation or is "Christianity" as it is practiced by our leaders?
These are all questions which should be asked by rational people. Furthermore, in this primary season, the "faiths" of the major candidates which remain standing are all being questioned, with Obama's faith being questioned most closely by those accusing him of being a "secret Muslim", most SURELY a threat to our own security.
McCain's faith too is being laid bare to the public with the outing of two "ministers" in particular who have thrown their support to him, John Hagee-a right-wing Christian Zionist who's dispensationalist creed seeks to hasten Aramgedon (and who is claiming McCain sought his endorsement) and the "Reverend" Parsley who calls for the destruction of Islam as the answer to all ills.
But what about Hillary? In a recent debate when asked how she would use her faith to handle the presidency should she be elected, she reminded us all that during her years as first lady her faith was truly tested and that many had been praying for her during her tribulation, a reference obviously to her "trial as wife" in her public humiliation as co-dependent in a marriage marred by infidelity.
Just who were these "many people" who were praying for Hillary during this time when the first lady stood by her man?
As it turns out, they were her friends at her prayer group which she has attended regularly since 1993. As the audience oohs and ahs at Hillary's "strength" as a humiliated wife, the media let her statement stand for the time being. But now, the truth is seeping out about Hillary's prayer group in a soon to be published book. From the Nation magazine: (be SURE to link to the first link given-
There's a reason Hillary Clinton has remained relatively silent during the flap over intemperate remarks by Barack Obama's former pastor, Jeremiah Wright. When it comes to unsavory religious affiliations, she's a lot more vulnerable than Obama.
You can find all about it in a widely under-read article in the September 2007 issue of Mother Jones, in which Kathryn Joyce and Jeff Sharlet reported that "through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as "The "Fellowship," also known as The Family. But it won't be a secret much longer. Jeff Sharlet's shocking exposé The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power will be published in May.
Sean Hannity has called Obama's church a "cult," but that term applies far more aptly to Clinton's "Family," which is organized into "cells"--their term--and operates sex-segregated group homes for young people in northern Virginia. In 2002, Sharlet joined The Family's home for young men, forswearing sex, drugs and alcohol, and participating in endless discussions of Jesus and power. He wasn't undercover; he used his own name and admitted to being a writer. But he wasn't completely out of danger either. When he went outdoors one night to make a cell phone call, he was followed. He still gets calls from Family associates asking him to meet them in diners--alone. (Source)
As a woman, one of my major beefs with Hillary was that she chose to stay with Bill Clinton. While their marriage is none of my personal business, the fact that she chose to stand by her man struck me as a "power marriage" understanding. Even at that time the mumblings of her possible run for the presidency in the future to become America's first female president (made apparent in her carpet-bagging successful run as Senator from New York), it struck me that she would rather hold on to her connections through her husband than become a role model for women who's husbands repeatedly cheat on them. While I do not believe that Bill Clinton should have been impeached for his sexual picadilos and lame attempts at covering them up, I was deeply ashamed of Hillary's choice to perform a most public "Tammy Wynette"
So as the public is in a fury to delve into the "faiths" of the candidates, just what kind of "faith" does Hillary adhere to? The answer can be found HERE
Dysfunction in the Fellowship Family by Ben Daniel
(in part-excerpted-Doug Coe is the current president of the Fellowship Foundation)
In addition, some Christian leaders are beginning to raise cautious and thoughtful questions about the Fellowship’s attitude toward women. An Evangelical scholar told me of being troubled after a chapel service at the college where she works. Doug Coe’s sister, a Fellowshipadherent, had delivered a message promoting a spirituality that the scholar described as being “overly prescriptive of men’s and women’s roles and differences in function.”
Such attitudes toward women often are lived out in the Fellowship with painful consequences. Despite the spoken promise that they are to be considered equal partners in the Fellowship's ministry and honored sisters in the Fellowship family, the women of Potomac Point are treated as servants and are reminded that their role, both in life and in the work of the Fellowship, is one of quiet, strong support for the work of the men.
One gets the sense that in the Fellowship’s spiritual geography women are seen as roadblocks on the path to male spiritual enlightenment. One woman told me of her experience dating a manwho was part of a Fellowship cell in Southern California. As her boyfriend’s involvement grew, he pushed her to the margins of his life. “In my life,” he told her “the guys from the Fellowship are at the center, and my wife, whoever that will be, will be somewhere off to the side.”
In the waning days of the relationship she was approached by the wives of older Fellowship members. “Get out while you still can,” one warned. Another described her life as a Fellowship wife: “I’m always third. The Fellowship comes first in my husband’s life. Then our children. Then me.”
Many of the women with whom I spoke reported being treated, at the same time, as children in need of instruction and as sexual deviants worthy of reproach. Such perceptions are not unfounded. One deeply committed Fellowship member spoke of his marriage apologetically, comparing it to the marriage of the Biblical prophet Hosea, who was directed by God to marry a harlot so that the prophet might learn of the hardships God endures.
Though young women are admonished not to lead the men into temptation and the men are advised to be wary of feminine charms, there exists a strong emphasis on accountability through the absolute disclosure of real or imagined sin, which means the women’s private lives are necessarily exposed. A young woman told me of how, after ending a relationship with a Fellowship member, other men in the ex-boyfriend’s cell began to show up in her life, making her feel as if they, having been privy to the intimate details of the relationship, were willing and ready to experience temptation for themselves. ___________________________________________________________
As read above, this "faith" to which Hillary turns is a male dominated faith in addition to being the faith of the "powerful" in Washington as witnessed in it's many members as well as the annual White House Prayer Breakfast. May I ask, where does the First Amendment guaranteeing separation of church and state play in to this scenario? Also, may I ask, how does FAITH, so called CHRISTAN faith, play in to US foreign policy via this shadowy relationship between our government and the Fellowship Foundation? Can it without total hypocracy be claimed that so called Christianity is not behind our foreign policy which has used it's military to invade and occupy Iraq, and needless to say guide all of our foreign policy in the Middle East? Just WHO'S military has wrought the most destruction and loss of life? And WHO has been the victim of this marred policy?
Muslim nations.
So while our country goes through this political process of nominating candidates for the presidency, Hillary Clinton has yet to be scrutinized for her own faith while her campaign has had to fire people for slurring Obama's faith. And who is at the head of this, Hillary Clinton herself, the "little woman" who stood by her man and wants us all to believe that as a woman she would bring a different tone to our country.
HOGWASH!!
To read more about the Fellowship Foundation, read Wayne Madsen's report, "Expose: The Christian Mafia Part 1 and Part 2". This is a VERY long report taking you through the tangled history of this organization, . A report well worth the time taken to read it.
On the fifth anniversary of the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, I offer these two videos, the testimony of Mike Prysner at last week's Winter Soldier hearings.
The "Winter Soldier Investigation" was a media event sponsored by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War intended to publicize war crimes and atrocities by the United States Armed Forces and their allies in the Vietnam War. The VVAW challenged the morality and conduct of the war by showing the direct relationship between military policies and war crimes in Vietnam. The three-day gathering of 109 veterans and 16 civilians took place in Detroit, Michigan, from January 31-February 2, 1971. Discharged servicemen from each branch of military service, as well as civilian contractors, medical personnel and academics, all gave testimony about war crimes they had committed or witnessed during the years of 1963-1970.[1][2][3]
With the exception of Pacifica Radio, the event was not covered extensively outside Detroit. However, several journalists and film crews recorded the event,
The media might not have covered Winter Soldier, but we can. If you are a blogger, please post this testimony of Mike Prysner.
American ISM Volunteer Beaten and Arrested in Israel
Blake Murphy, an American activist working with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) in the West Bank, was beaten and arrested by Israeli army and police forces on March 14, 2008. He now faces a series of evidently false charges from the Israeli authorities due to his work supporting non-violent resistance to the occupation in Palestine and is due to be deported to the United States in the immediate future. While in custody Blake has had many of his legal rights abused by the Israeli authorities.
Blake was arrested during the weekly demonstration in the village of Bi'lin, where the separation wall annexes much of the Palestinian villages land. Blake was picked out of the demonstration by the Israeli forces, violently assaulted, with pepper spray put in his eyes before being taken off and subsequently arrested.
Blake Murphy had to be taken to hospital due to his injuries caused by the soldiers. He appeared in court on March 15, and at that time the judge prolonged his detention until March 18. He was then told that he would have to reappear in court on March 18, only to be told that this was not the case, after spending 8 hours of that day locked in a room meant for 8along with 15 others waiting for his trial. While in custody, Blake has been denied a translator in court, he has been brought before a judge without his lawyer being informed, and he has been made to appear for a trial that was cancelled without him being informed.
Blake Murphy had been working for the last 8 and a half months in the Palestinian Occupied Territories with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). For over 6 months he was working as the media coordinator for the ISM and was therefore highly involved in supporting Palestinian non-violent resistance toward the occupation. It is for this reason that he was targeted by the Israeli authorities.
The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) is a Palestinian-led non-violent resistance movement committed to ending Israels illegal occupation of Palestinian land. They call for full compliance with all relevant UN resolutions and international law.
President George W. Bush The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20500 (202) 456-1414 White House Comment Line: (202) 456-1111 Fax: (202) 456-2461 E-mail: <president@whitehouse.gov>
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Department of State Washington, DC 20520 State Department Public Information Line: (202) 647-6575
Any Senator U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20510 (202) 224-3121
Any Representative U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-3121 E-mail Congress: visit the Web site <www.congress.org> for contact information.
The Israeli Embassy, Washington, DC (202) 364-5500
The Israeli Embassy, Canada (613) 567 6450
This video is UNBELIEVABLE. Take note of how the IOF is beating Blake Murphy after they have apprehended him. SICKENING!!!
Yesterday in a moving speech you gave on racism, you put our country on notice that we must look forward and not back in tackling the still existing cancer of racism in our country. Your words moved me Senator as they have moved me since your famous speech at the Democratic national convention which thrust you on to the public scene. I have listened to you when you speak of the "Audacity of Hope", because as an American, I wish to hear someone of your stature tell all of America that to "hope" is not audacious, it is a basic human instinct which must be honored and allowed to be implemented with the work which goes in to making "hope" manifest itself in reality.
Yet a portion of your speech yesterday disturbed me very much. It was when you stated the following in referring to your pastor's comments concerning Israel's actions:
"Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."
Today I read yet one more disturbing report of Israeli actions against the Palestinians. It is posted below.
Senator Obama, you are too young to have actually marched in Reverend King's protests, having grown up in a country that due to MLK's and other's valiant sacrifices the Civil Rights Act was passed which is the basis of protection for minorities in our country, that which is turned to at all times to fight still lingering racism.
Senator Obama, you were excoriated for your statement, "No one has suffered more than the Palestinians". After you were brought to task for such a statement, you have made every effort to let the public and those who "support Israel" know that you are indeed a "supporter of Israel". Last year you attended an AIPAC conference at which you sought to alleviate any doubts that you "support Israel"in your speech that day. Then, recently, at the request of the Simon Wiesenthall Center (Specifically, we are referring to your recent letter (following the urging of the Simon Wiesenthal Center ) to the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations requesting a veto of the Security Council resolution related to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza source) who has stepped up to defend you against the accusations that you are a "secret Muslim", you penned a letter to Ambassador Khalzid at the UN condemning the rocket attacks coming out of Gaza. I too am against rocket attacks Senator, but I am also against the siege of Gaza which is starving the people there, something you have chosen not to condemn, but rather to support to show you are indeed a "supporter of Israel". Have you read another letter to you Senator concerning this matter?
In yesterday's speech Senator, once again you sought to confirm your identity as a supporter of Israel and even go further to state that it is "radical Islam" and not Israel's actions which is at the root of the problem in the Palestinian/Israeli dispute. I ask you Senator, how many times have you marched in protest? I also ask you, were African Americans ever in the history of this country imprisoned behind a wall because they sought equality and freedom from oppression?
This is the article I would like you to read Senator. Please keep in mind that our generation has been the beneficiary of those willing to march and put their lives on the line before us. Also, keep in mind that Israel is a signatory to the International Covenant of Civil Rights and Political Rights which clearly states:
1 . In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under international law and do not involve discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin.
One must of course think that it is permisable to shoot at protesters to begin with Senator Obama, which clearly it is not when those protesters are fighting an ILLEGAL wall. Israel is claiming this right Senator, when it is not theirs. Please note, China received world condemnation when they opened fire killing Tibetans trying to enter Nepal illegally claiming they fired in self-defense. China is continuing to illegally and brutally occupy Tibet Senator and you just recently were one of the first to come out openly condemning Chinese actions, yet you have chosen to side with those "Israel supporters" in your public statements concerning Palestine
Now Senator Obama, since giving your historical speech on racism yesterday, what do you have to say for our "stalwart ally" which chooses to only shoot the legs of Palestinian protesters? This "exclusive" target shooting which has been approved by Israel's attorney is being done with AMERICAN made Ruger rifles Senator. I have little "hope" in receiving an answer Senator, my "hope" lies in your own efforts towards fighting racism in our country, that it might be a seed planted within your promise of "change" and respect for all human life.
Border police snipers have already started applying new regulations
Israel snipers get OK to fire at barrier protestors
Attorney general eases firing regulations against Palestinian demonstrators damaging Jerusalem barrier.
JERUSALEM - Israel's attorney general has eased firing regulation restrictions against Palestinians demonstrating at the separation barrier near Jerusalem, a justice ministry official said on Wednesday.
The decision allows border police snipers to fire at protestors damaging the controversial barrier that Israel is constructing in occupied east Jerusalem and across the West Bank, he said.
Under the new regulations, snipers may fire at the legs of adults tagged as "key instigators," according to the mass-selling Maariv daily. Firing on Israeli and foreign citizens remains banned.
Border police snipers armed with Ruger 22 rifles have already started applying the new regulations, and over the past month alone 13 Palestinians have been shot in the legs in the Jerusalem area, the report said.
The semi-automatic Ruger 22 is widely used for target shooting sports and for hunting, but Israel's security forces have been using the American-manufactured rifle for sharp shooting.
Israel says the massive barrier, made of electric fencing, barbed wire and concrete walls, is needed to stop potential attackers from infiltrating the country and Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.
Palestinians have denounced it as an "apartheid wall" aimed at grabbing their land and undermining the viability of their promised state.
In 2004, the International Court of Justice issued a non-binding ruling that parts of the 650-kilometre (410-mile) barrier criss-crossing the West Bank are illegal and should be torn down. (source)
For those of you missed this momentous historical speech by Barak Obama
The overall speech on race is right on, but the statements in bold below are once again Barak Obama pandering to AIPAC. Is it REALLY radical Islam which is opposed to Israel, or is it a POLITICAL problem rooted in the imposition of Zionism upon an indigenous people which uprooted Palestinians from their homeland and has held on to a BRUTAL and ILLEGAL occupation? I suggest this is the case, and NOT what Senator Obama is stating in this speech.
Text of Obama’s Speech: A More Perfect Union
Here, the full text of Sen. Barack Obama’s speech, “A More Perfect Union,” as prepared for delivery.
“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”
Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.
The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.
Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.
And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.
This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign – to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together – unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction – towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.
This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.
I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners – an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.
It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one.
Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.
This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.
And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.
On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.
I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.
But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.
As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.
Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way
But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:
“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”
That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.
I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.
These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.
Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.
But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.
The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.
Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.
Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.
Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments – meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.
A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families – a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.
This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.
But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.
And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.
In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.
Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.
Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.
This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.
But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.
For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans — the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.
Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.
The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old — is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know — what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.
In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.
We can do that.
But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.
That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.
This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.
This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.
This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.
I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.
There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today – a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.
There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.
And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.
She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.
She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.
Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.
Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”
“I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.
But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.
Last week in another case of censorship by those not wishing Israel to be criticized in ANY manner, the Cleveland-Heights-University Heights Public Library canceled the showing of the film, "Searching for Peace in the Middle East"
ACLU accuses library of censorship for canceling Israeli-Palestinian film
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Jesse Tinsley
Plain Dealer Reporter
The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio is charging the Cleveland-Heights-University Heights Public Library with censorship for canceling a film on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict scheduled for Wednesday night.
Some critics of the film said it was biased against the Jewish state and recommended a more balanced program in the library's three-part series on the Middle East conflict.
"The cancellation of this event is blatant and shameful censorship of particular views," ACLU legal director Jeffrey Gamso said in a letter to the library. "Libraries should be a place where members of the public congregate and exchange ideas with one another
Library director Stephen Wood disputed censorship allegations.
"My commitment to the community is not to have censorship and is to be a bastion of free speech," Wood said. "It is incumbent upon us that presentations that the library makes are balanced and that we show all points of view."
However, Wood said it was called to the staff's attention that the 30-minute film was a "controversial and biased work."
The film, "Searching for Peace in the Middle East," was to be followed by a panel discussion by members of the Arab, Christian, Jewish and Muslim communities at the library's Lee Road branch.
Julia Shearson, executive director of the Cleveland chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the film could have sparked dialogue among both sides here.
"I did watch the film, and I could see certain things that would make the Jewish community concerned," said Shearson, who was to moderate the event. "But the most moving part about the film was Israeli bereaved parents talking about their dead teenage daughter, and I thought that would help the Palestinian community see the wounds on the other side."
Wood said the library is forming a committee to get input on how to put the program together with all viewpoints. The library would then sponsor and reschedule the series, he said.
"Searching for Peace in the Middle East" was aired nonetheless Wednesday night at Christ the Redeemer Church in Cleveland Heights.
The following is the "controversial" film "SearchingforPeaceintheMiddleEast which caused the uproar at the library. If this is what caused the uproar, then something is VERY wrong.
Links for some of the organizations mentioned in the film:
Note the Right of Return is not emphasized in this film which would TRULY make Israel a "democratic" nation willing to live at peace with its' neighbor according to international law From the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country".
Also, the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza has NOT resulted in freedom for Gazans who have become prisoners of the siege, controlling all movement in and out of Gaza, both of people and of necessary items which can sustain them. Maybe these are a few of the things which would have been discussed by the panel. I sure hope so.
Please visit the Avaas site where you can sign the petition to end the siege of Gaza now.
The old saying, "Music to calm the masses" comes to mind in the article below concerning a new radio station who's aim is to bring understanding. I'm listening to it right now as I'm posting and there is good news on it!
You can tune in and listen to this channel streaming HERE
What is really interesting is that this channel airs from Ramallah, from an article dated February 27,2007:
RAM FM received a license from the Palestinian Authority in December 2005. They do not have a license to operate in Israel so the show will be transmitted from Ramallah. The broadcasters told CTV News that it was easier to apply for a licence in the West Bank under the Palestinian Authority rather than go through Israeli bureaucracy.
That same article also states:
The radio content will be mostly pop music until people become aware of the station. Then the format will change to talk radio with news bulletins and call-in shows.
Palestinian reporters for the station will work out of a Ramallah, West Bank studio while Israeli anchors will sign on from West Jerusalem starting next week.
"Each person just has their own narrative and they don't interact. It's important to understand the other," said Palestinian reporter Ashira Ramadan.
But with the two studios divided by checkpoints and Israel's security barrier, travel restrictions mean most of the staff in the West Bank will never meet their Israeli counterparts face-to-face.
Amid the latest flare-up in Israeli-Palestinian violence, there are plenty of raised voices on either side. A new ad campaign suggests a different way to address the divide: speak, or even sing, to both sides at once.
Bob Marley, or likeness thereof, in an ad for 93.6 RAM FM.
The campaign is for a radio station, 93.6 RAM FM, which broadcasts from Jerusalem and Ramallah, reaching Israelis and Palestinians in English, rather than Hebrew or Arabic.
The station was set up last year by Issie Kirsh, a South African Jew. The idea came from a similar station, Radio 702, that he set up in the apartheid era, allowing South African blacks and whites to speak on the same call-in and talk shows.
The station underlines its impartiality by avoiding Israeli or Arab songs and featuring the music of American, British and other English-speaking artists.
Some of them, including the Beatles and Bob Marley, are prominent in the ad campaign, which has started to appear on billboards, in newspapers and magazines, and on buses. The portraits are rendered through a kind of pointillist technique that uses the stamps applied to passports at border crossings to reinforce the idea that music can surmount such barriers.
Unusual for an ad campaign in the region, the same images were used in Israeli and in Palestinian areas.
Guy Bar, creative director of Gitam BBDO, the Tel Aviv agency that created the campaign, said, “The station views music as being a universal language that can cross all borders and reach all people, all nations and all religions.”
A spokeswoman for the station said it was spending about $400,000 on the campaign. So far, she said, it has attracted only small audiences, but it hopes those will grow so it can start selling ads, too.